# Books: why the Internet hasn’t killed them off
**Date de l'événement :** 23/01/2019
* Publié le 23/01/2019

### Image
![1.jpg](https://firebasestorage.googleapis.com/v0/b/memory-sp-pr.appspot.com/o/prod%2F1y7CgDOTakHDiB3dgoi0%2FprojectsMedias%2FUZzr3tFbY2J0k1vr4eFG%2F1.jpg?alt=media&token=e21a7b93-681d-4d84-b5c9-1dd9875b25b7) 

##  
Book bans in U.S. schools and libraries during the 2021-22 school year disproportionately targeted children’s books written by people of color – especially women of color – according to a peer-reviewed study we published. They also tended to feature characters of color.  
  
In addition, we found book bans were more common in right-leaning counties that were becoming less conservative over time.  
  
These findings were based on a comprehensive review of a then-record 2,532 bans that took effect in 32 states during the 2021-22 school year and compiled by PEN America, a nonprofit that defends the freedom of expression. The bans involved 1,643 unique book titles. We combined this with data on counties, sales of restricted books and author demographics.  
  
While much has been written about the rise in book bans, there has been little empirical work done on their content, causes and consequences.  
  
In our review, we found that 59% of banned books were children’s books featuring diverse characters or nonfiction books about historical figures and social movements. The top banned books were “Gender Queer: A Memoir,” by Maia Kobabe, which was banned by 41 school districts; “All Boys Aren’t Blue,” by George M. Johnson, with 29 bans; and “Out of Darkness,” by Ashley Hope Pérez, with 24 bans.  
  
What’s more, authors of color – particularly women of color – were far more likely to be banned compared with white authors. Authors of color wrote 39% of the banned books in our study. Women of color alone penned almost a quarter of them. That’s even though authors of color make up just 10% of U.S. authors and write less than 5% of the most popular books in the U.S.   
  
\[...\]  
  
→ [Cliquez ici pour lire cet article en français](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/content/2019-01-13/autour-du-livre-de-nouvelles-pratiques-alimentent-lintelligence-collective_TIn7MWCOjLYCWNNWupIr).

**Pour lire l'article complet, cliquez sur le lien ci-dessous :** [https://theconversation.com/books-why-the-internet-hasnt-killed-them-off-110320](https://theconversation.com/books-why-the-internet-hasnt-killed-them-off-110320)

## Auteur(s)
Dominique Boullier, Mariannig Le Béchec, Maxime Crépel

### Date
23/01/2019

### Type(s) de ressource
`#Texte` 

### Discipline(s)
`#Sociologie` 

### Thématique(s)
`#Communication / journalisme / médias` `#Culture / arts / sport` `#Numérique et technologie` 

### Objectif(s) de développement durable
`#4 - Éducation de qualité` 

### Aire(s) géographique(s)
`#Europe` 

### Langue(s)
`#Anglais` 

## Crédits photo
Pixabay

### Licence attribuée à l'article
`#CC-BY-ND (Attribution; Pas de modification)` 

### Famille(s) de contenu
`#Recherche` 

### Type(s) d'accès
`#Accès libre` 

### Partenaire(s)
**[The Conversation](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/structure/the-conversation_QdYqgYnzKVyePLgMp3g8)** 


### Hébergeur(s)
`#The Conversation` 

## Droits
Les ressources et les images visibles sur Sciences Po Sources sont susceptibles d’être protégées par un droit de propriété intellectuelle (comme par exemple un droit d’auteur ou une marque) qui peuvent appartenir à Sciences Po ou à des tiers. Pour plus de précisions notamment sur les usages autorisés et non autorisés, consulter les [Conditions Particulières d’Utilisation](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/p/cpu).



---
### Navigation pour IA
- [Index de tous les contenus](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/llms.txt)
- [Plan du site (Sitemap)](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/sitemap.xml)
- [Retour à l'accueil](https://sources.sciencespo.fr/)